Trzy prace warp z 2026 r. to jedno skorelowane źródło: ten sam pojedynczy autor, preprinty arXiv bez DOI czasopisma, zero cytowań każda w OpenAlex (odtworzone na żywo z kontrolą pozytywną: S-0001 pokazuje 45). Z tym zastrzeżeniem: S-0003 certyfikuje ściany Van Den Broecka jako typ IV Hawkinga-Ellisa — brak układu spoczynkowego — POWYŻEJ przejścia typ I/typ IV przy v_s ~ 0,36 (wartość żyje w makrze źródła; tekst kanoniczny ją gubi), przy ścianach Alcubierre'a i Natário zdominowanych przez typ IV we wszystkich prędkościach; a napęd 'bez materii egzotycznej' z S-0005 jest, wedle jego własnych słów, przyczynowy, podświetlny i stromo, lecz dodatnio kosztowny.
Na czym to się opiera
Ataki przeprowadzone przeciwko niemu
Ran all four vectors. (A2, survived) Reproduced the citation prong live on OpenAlex 2026-08-10: title.search for each of the three 2026 titles returned only records with cited_by_count=0, sole author An T. Le / A. T. Le, and no journal DOI (only 10.48550/arxiv.* DataCite and Zenodo DOIs); positive control https://api.openalex.org/works/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.064038 returned cited_by_count=45, exactly the claim's pinned value. Verified single authorship directly in all three corpus main.tex author blocks (identical name, affiliations, emails). Verified the macro parenthetical: corpus/S-0003/main.tex line 29 is \newcommand{\vdbTransitionVS}{0.36}, and canonical fulltext.md contains zero occurrences of "0.36" and two unexpanded "vdbTransitionVS" tokens. (A3, decisive) Compared the claim's Van den Broeck conjunct against E-0031's span and its surrounding canonical fulltext: the source sentence, by ellipsis, says the VdB walls are "Type-IV DOMINATED" above the transition, and at fulltext char ~36957 defines the transition as "its wall Type I fraction crossing 50 [%] at v_s≈vdbTransitionVS". The claim instead asserts the walls are "Hawking-Ellis Type IV — no rest frame — ABOVE" the transition, and by inverting the clause order (VdB first, Alc/Nat with "Type-IV dominated" second) it severs the ellipsis and reads as a deliberate contrast: VdB fully Type IV vs Alc/Nat merely dominated. The source's own certified numbers falsify that reading: Table tab:velocity_type gives VdB Type I = 12.2% (v_s=0.5), 18.3% (1.0), 25.6% (2.0), and the text says the Type-I fraction "rises monotonically, reaching ... 29.6% (Van den Broeck) at v_s=2.5" because "more of the wall acquires a rest frame as the bubble speeds up" — so above 0.36 a substantial and growing share of the wall HAS a rest frame. Reproduction script: attack_c0022.py in the scratch dir (run from the repo root). This is the same failure class (dropped source qualifier) for which X-0023 refuted this claim's direct parent C-0016. || FINDINGS: Refuting facts: (1) canonical fulltext S-0003 @ ~36957: "Van den Broeck additionally passes through a velocity-driven Type-I to Type-IV transition, its wall Type I fraction crossing 50 at v_s≈vdbTransitionVS" — the transition is a 50%-majority crossing, not an onset of all-Type-IV; (2) body.tex Table tab:velocity_type: VdB Type I/IV = 12.2/87.8 (v_s=0.5), 18.3/81.7 (1.0), 25.6/74.4 (2.0); (3) "The Type-IV fraction decreases with v_s (more of the wall acquires a rest frame as the bubble speeds up)" — the claim's "no rest frame" appositive is false of 12-30% of the wall above the transition, and the trend runs opposite to the claim's implication. Surviving prongs: single author An T. Le confirmed in all three main.tex files; OpenAlex live 2026-08-10 gives cited_by_count 0/0/0 with no journal DOIs (only arXiv/Zenodo DOIs) and positive control 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.064038 = 45, matching Q-0002; main.tex:29 = \newcommand{\vdbTransitionVS}{0.36} with "0.36" absent from canonical fulltext (2 unexpanded macro tokens); Alc/Nat "Type-IV dominated at all speeds" holds (Natário worst case 61.3% Type IV at v_s=2.5); S-0005 quotes E-0026/E-0027 are exact ("causal, subluminal... no exotic matter in the thin-shell idealization"; "cost is steep, but positive and finite"). Fix for the superseding claim: render VdB as "Type-IV dominated above a Type-I→Type-IV transition (wall Type-I fraction crossing 50% at v_s≈0.36)", attach "no rest frame" to Type-IV points, and optionally carry the decreasing-fraction direction. || ADJUDICATOR (independent second opinion, verdict UPHELD): Attacker's REFUTED verdict stands. I re-ran the decisive A3 step directly against the repo (corpus/S-0003) and via the attacker's script (/tmp/.../redteam34/C-0022/attack_c0022.py); every fact reproduces. (1) The source predicate for Van den Broeck is "Type-IV dominated", not "Type IV": the abstract sentence containing E-0031 (fulltext ~char 4553) elides "are Type-IV