← Findings

C-0006 Verified HIGH certainty

The symbol r_c in Alcubierre's energy-density equation denotes the spherical radius r_s. Recomputing the density from the metric via the Hamiltonian constraint reproduces the published equation exactly, and only, under that reading.

Standing our derivation · derivation under assumptions · TRL 1 Assumes the metric of eq. 5 with unit lapse and flat spatial slices; K_ij as given by the paper's own eq. 7; a GENERAL shape function f(r_s) — the result does not use the tanh profile Stops applying metrics whose spatial slices are not intrinsically flat, where the three-Ricci scalar no longer drops out of the Hamiltonian constraint Computed in compute/verify_energy_density.py, tests/test_q1_rc.py Note Resolves open question Q1. Three rival readings of r_c (R, rho, x) leave non-zero residuals.

What it rests on

E-0009 · S-0002 — The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity · equation
…pidly a "top hat" function: With the above definitions, the metric () can be rewritten as: d s^2 = - d t^2 + ( d x - v_s f ( r_s ) d t )^2 + d y^2 + d z^2 . It is easy to understand the geometry of our spacetime from the previous expressions. Firs…
EXACT · re-found in source
E-0012 · S-0002 — The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity · equation
…s is given by: then one can show that these observers will see an energy density given by: T^{\alpha \beta} n_{\alpha} n_{\beta} = \alpha^2 T^{ 0 0} = \frac{1}{8 \pi} G^{ 0 0} = - \frac{1}{8 \pi} \frac{v_s^2 \rho^2}{4 {r_c}^2} ( \frac{d f}{d r_s} )^2 . The fact that this expression is everywhere negative implies that the weak and dominant en…
EXACT · re-found in source

Attacks run against it

X-0005 SURVIVED recomputation · by straz

Attacked the reading by trying to make a different one work. Built the extrinsic curvature from the paper's eq. 7 with a general shape function, contracted it through the Hamiltonian constraint with R^(3) = 0 (valid because eq. 1 gives flat spatial slices), and compared the result against the published expression under four candidate readings of r_c: the spherical radius r_s, the bubble radius R, the perpendicular distance rho, and the axial distance x. Only r_s gives a zero residual; the other three leave residuals that are explicitly printed rather than summarised. The derivation never uses the tanh profile, so the identification is not an artefact of the shape function.

Download the raw record for this claim →